[Mobile Health Applications (mHealth apps) for breastfeeding: a qualitative review using the Mobile Application Rating Scale.] / Mobile Health app (mHealth app) per l'allattamento al seno: una revisione qualitativa mediante la Mobile Application Rating Scale.

INTRODUCTION: mHealth apps are the most commonly used applications by women for seeking information and support for breastfeeding. The primary goal of this study is to provide a quality assessment of Italian-language mHealth apps for breastfeeding using the Italian version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (I-MARS). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on the Apple App Store, Google Play Store, and Windows Store. Inclusion criteria were: mHealth apps available in Italian, free of charge, and focused on the theme of breastfeeding. The quality assessment of the eligible mHealth apps was carried out on the latest available version using the I-MARS, by two authors independently. RESULTS: A total of 381 mHealth apps were identified, of which 38 mHealth apps were included and evaluated (n=9 on Google Play Store, n=29 on Apple App Store). The average total score of the objective dimension of I-MARS was found to be adequate, equal to 3,07±0,75, with a Cohen's Kappa score of 65,8%. The subjective dimension of the I-MARS, however, achieved a low average total score of 2,44±1,03, with a Cohen's Kappa score of 60,5%. In this regard, the subjective dimension of the I-MARS shows lower values compared to the subjective evaluation of the users (3,28±1,95). DISCUSSION: The informational quality dimension of mHealth apps was found to be lacking and/or inadequate in 80% of cases. 53% of the selected mHealth apps presented average quality scores that were adequate. The results of this study thus lay the groundwork for future recommendations for the development and proper use of mHealth apps for the protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties Using COSMIN.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding self-efficacy has been proven to play a predictive role in enhancing breastfeeding initiation and continuation. Breastfeeding self-efficacy measurement tools have facilitated healthcare professionals' early identification and support of women at higher risk of early discontinuation of breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of breastfeeding self-efficacy measurement tools. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out in three phases. Phase One comprised a systematic literature review performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from February 2021 to January 2023, including 36 studies for final analysis. Phase Two provided a quality appraisal of the psychometric properties of each of the seven breastfeeding self-efficacy measurement tools, according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist (COSMIN) guidelines. Phase Three summarized and graded the overall quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) modified approach. RESULT: The included articles comprised 9,225 participants and seven breastfeeding self-efficacy measurement tools. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form (BSES-SF), and Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale were supported by Grade A evidence sustaining their validity and reliability to assess breastfeeding self-efficacy in the continuum of maternity care. The BSES-SF is the most feasible tool in clinical practice and the most utilized internationally, available in 15 languages. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provided a Grade A recommendation on breastfeeding measurement tools that will be helpful both for clinical and research purposes.Registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021238450).

Developmental Strategy and Validation of the Midwifery Interventions Classification (MIC): A Delphi Study Protocol and Results from the Developmental Phase.

This study protocol aims to describe the rationale and developmental strategy of the first study in the Italian context which aimed to define a Midwifery Interventions Classification, an evidence-based, standardized taxonomy and classification of midwifery interventions. Midwifery interventions require a specific definition, developed through a consensus-building process by stakeholders to develop the Italian taxonomy of the Midwifery Interventions Classification with the potential for international transferability, implementation, and scaling up. A multi-round Delphi study was designed between June and September 2022, and data collection is planned between February 2023 and February 2024. The developmental phase of the study is based on a literature review to select meaningful midwifery interventions from the international literature, aiming to identify an evidence-based list of midwifery interventions. This phase led to including 16 articles derived from a systematic search performed on PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus; 164 midwifery interventions were selected from the data extraction performed on the 16 included articles. Healthcare professionals, researchers, and service users will be eligible panelists for the Delphi surveys. The protocol designed a dynamic number of consultation rounds based on the ratings and interim analysis. A nine-point Likert scoring system is designed to evaluate midwifery interventions. Attrition and attrition bias will be evaluated. The results from the study designed in this protocol will inform the development of the Italian taxonomy of the Midwifery Interventions Classification. A shared classification of midwifery interventions will support audit and quality improvement, education, and comparable data collections for research, sustaining public recognition of midwifery interventions to promote optimal maternal and newborn health.

The Italian midwifery core outcome set (M-COS) for healthy childbearing women and newborns: Development and initial validation study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a midwifery core outcome set (M-COS) for Italian settings based on a salutogenic framework of maternity care. DESIGN: A multi-phase and multi-method study was performed. In phase one, we conducted a literature review to identify a preliminary set of outcomes sensitive to midwifery care. In phase two, the qualitative and quantitative content validity of the M-COS was tested. Finally, in the third phase, construct validity was explored through a cross-sectional study to assess the psychometric properties of the M-COS through exploratory and confirmative factor analysis. This study was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020 in Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Three main groups of experts/midwives were involved. Group One (n = 10) was involved in the content validity phase, while the other two groups (Group Two and Group Three) were involved in the construct validity phase (n = 300). RESULTS: The M-COS includes six outcome domains and thirty-one core outcomes perceived as sensitive to midwifery care, namely: mortality and morbidity (n = 6 outcomes), childbirth (n = 3), postnatal period (n = 6), maternal health (n = 11), maternal-infant bonding (n = 3), and maternal self-care (n = 2). All domains showed good evidence of internal consistency. CONCLUSION: The Italian M-COS is a novel tool that will facilitate the consistent measurement of core outcomes sensitive to midwifery care from the antenatal to the postnatal period in Italian settings. This initial work will be followed by further studies, including validation by service users. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of the M-COS in clinical practice would facilitate evidence-based data collection and thus contribute to promoting high-quality maternity care.

Mediterranean Diet and Lifestyle Habits during Pregnancy: Is There an Association with Small for Gestational Age Infants? An Italian Single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: The small-for-gestational-age (SGA) in infants is related to an increased risk of developing Non-Communicable Diseases later in life. The Mediterranean diet (MD) is related to lower odds of being SGA. The study explored retrospectively the association between SGA, maternal MD adherence, lifestyle habits and other SGA risk factors during pregnancy. METHODS: One hundred women (16-44 years) with a pregnancy at term were enrolled. Demographic data, parity, pre-gestational BMI, gestational weight gain, pregnancy-related diseases, and type of delivery were collected. The MD adherence (MEDI-LITE score ≥ 9), physical activity level, and smoking/alcohol consumption were registered. SGA neonates were diagnosed according to the neonatal growth curves. RESULTS: Women were divided into "SGA group" vs. "non-SGA group". The MD was adopted by 71% of women and its adherence was higher in the "non-SGA group" (p = 0.02). The prevalence of pregnancy-related diseases (gestational diabetes/pregnancy-induced hypertension) was higher in the "SGA group" (p = 0.01). The logistic regression showed that pregnancy-related diseases were the only independent risk factor for SGA. CONCLUSIONS: MD may indirectly reduce the risk of SGA since it prevents and exerts a positive effect on pregnancy-related diseases (e.g., gestational diabetes and hypertension). The small sample size of women in the SGA group of the study imposes a major limitation to the results and conclusions of this research, suggesting however that it is worthy of further investigation.